3

Synonyms can be made without a tag by that name existing. Please do not create tags just for the purpose of them becoming synonyms.


2

I think merging and synonymizing ground-equipment into equipment is a good idea.


2

Given that the falcon-9r tag description says "variant of the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket with reusable first and second stages" I suggest we remove it entirely, folding any misuse of it into falcon-9, since no such animal exists.


2

There's nothing wrong with a question having falcon-9 and falcon9-r tags, even if it's only about falcon9-r. Falcon 9R is just a special configuration of Falcon 9, so the falcon-9 tag still applies. The only reason someone should drop the more general tag is if they need the space for other tags. That said, if someone applied falcon9-r to a question that ...


1

I upvoted this, but now that I've had time to think about it, I'm not entirely sure it's necessary. The tag attitude is not inappropriate on those questions, and the tag attitude-determination-and-control has enough questions on its own that it's not in need of a boost. Obviously, it would be ideal if those questions had attitude-determination-and-control, ...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible