5
$\begingroup$

I often use a system that wants to block selective statements that I send out. Not sure why, but it's a work system, go figure... I've found that going to the site in HTTPS will prevent such filtering from occurring (I use my own devices so no custom root certificates installed). I tried to go to meta via HTTPS, and was told that it isn't allowed. Why is HTTPS allowed on the main site, but not on meta?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So your company is doing DPI... That's very intrusive. More than a bug, I think this is a feature request. $\endgroup$ – Antzi Dec 23 '15 at 16:15
  • $\begingroup$ It took me quite a while to realize what was happening myself... $\endgroup$ – PearsonArtPhoto Dec 23 '15 at 16:30
  • $\begingroup$ HTTPS on meta is not supported right now. Unfortunately, we can get a certification for meta.*.stackexchange.com and we don't relish the idea of maintaining hundreds of certifications for per-site metas. There is a plan, but it's not exactly a top priority at the moment. $\endgroup$ – Jon Ericson Dec 23 '15 at 18:03
  • $\begingroup$ meta.stackexchange.com/q/265918/155668 . Oh well, same site, but on meta.stackexchange... Sigh. $\endgroup$ – PearsonArtPhoto Dec 23 '15 at 18:42
  • $\begingroup$ I have switched to the Emacs app for Stack Exchange. It works fine, and in fact I'm posting this comment via TLS API. $\endgroup$ – Deer Hunter Jan 12 '16 at 23:18
3
$\begingroup$

I'm retagging this since the main issue is tracked over on MSE.

The gist of the problem here is that to properly fix this, we need to change how meta URLs work. We do have a plan, but it's not a trivial change and we're having trouble finding the time while juggling all the other stuff. HTTP-everywhere-on-the-network is not abandoned, it just keeps losing the priority battle for the time being. Hopefully soon? But unfortunately I can't make any promises on the timeline here.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .