7
$\begingroup$

There is a tag (1 question) and a tag (9 questions).

I believe they should be merged with one as a synonym.

I personally think is better than

| |
$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ All right, I implemented this answer: space.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1591/58 The renames and synonyms are complete. $\endgroup$ – called2voyage Aug 3 at 13:29
  • $\begingroup$ @called2voyage For questions like these about tag renaming/merge should I tag it as feature-request or as discussion? $\endgroup$ – Speedphoenix Aug 3 at 13:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for asking. I didn't notice your tags. It should be discussion not feature-request. feature-request is when you want SE to add new functionality to the site. $\endgroup$ – called2voyage Aug 3 at 13:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @called2voyage I updated the tag then. (and for my previous question on the fairing catchers as well) $\endgroup$ – Speedphoenix Aug 3 at 13:51
4
$\begingroup$

Both representations have widespread usage, but the Roman numerals are how it is represented on the official ULA webpage for it. The only major issue is the tag already exists and would need to be renamed too for consistency.

The only other potential issue (which is pretty minor) is implies a potential rocket, but that tag is already in use to represent the concept of delta-v (change in velocity). However, I think the time when a "Delta V" rocket would have been seriously considered is past.

Anyway, I'm down for renaming both tags, but I can see how this might be controversial, so I'm going to offer both options in separate answers.

| |
$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$
| |
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$
| |
$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .