The question Why does the Mars InSight Lander look wet like a cardboard box that came in contact with water? [closed] may have a conspiracy theorist bent but it was handled well and has three very well received and well-written answers that demonstrate a lot of effort by several people.
The OP has had four previous hoaxer-type questions:
- Is there any independent evidence that the US successfully put landers on the surface of Mars? [closed] (and now deleted so it's harder to find)
- Two totally different pictures of Apollo 15 landing site released by NASA 40 years apart. What causes these differences? [closed]
- More water in a crater on Mars than the quantity dumped by the river Nile into the Mediterranean sea in 45 years?
- The speed of Apollo 11 at first stage separation was apparently only about 40% of what NASA claims? What does this indicate?
One of those three is deleted but that makes sense as it has no answers. However, the Why does the Mars Insight.. question also has two
What would be the rationale for deleting this question, which has so many carefully written and researched answers?