Return to Question

The whole edit history can be seen there. Here I'll just capture the changes in the title of the question. Kudos for the OP to work hard to maintain the title as a reflection of the current question whatever it happens to be, but this many different titles gives insight into how large and frequent the changes were.

The edit history of the first three days (90 hours) can be seen there. Here I'll just capture the changes in the title of the question. Kudos for the OP to work hard to maintain the title as a reflection of the current question whatever it happens to be, but this many different titles gives insight into how large and frequent the changes were.

 edit  hours    title
 26.   88.9    Did von Kármán ever say that the centrifugal force could be ignored for his definition?
 25.   85.9    Did von Kármán himself ever use the  horizontal line for his definition?
 24.   76.5    An airplane at the altitude of the Kármán line can't ignore the centrifugal force, can it?
 23.   76.1    An airplane at the altitude of the Kármán line can't ignore the centrifugal force, can he?
 22.   75.2    An airplane at the  altitude of the Kármán line  can't ignore the centrifugal force
 17.   73.4    Could the  definition of the Kármán line be described considering an airplane in orbit?
 16.   51.0    Why, at the altitude of the Kármán line, should a plane have to fly in a  straight line?
 15.   50.5    Could, at the altitude of the Kármán line a plane fly in a circular orbit?
 14.   47.7    Why, at the altitude of the Kármán line would a plane have to fly in a straight line?
 13.   45.9    15:39:32 Why at the altitude of the Kármán line  will a plane have to fly in a straight line?
 11.   39.3    Why should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curved one around the Earth?
 10.   24.9    Why should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curve band around the Earth?
  9.   24.6    Why 18:23:41 should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curved line?
  7.   18.4    Why not interpret the Kármán line as a realistic, curved line?
  3.   14.4    Potential merits for a realistic definition of the Kármán line?
  2.    9.9  * Potential merits of different definition for a Kármán-like line?
  1.    0.0    Why not choose a more realistic definition of the Kármán line?

 * my suggested improved titled wording  

 edit  hours    title
 26.   88.9    Did von Kármán ever say that the centrifugal force could be ignored for his definition?
 25.   85.9    Did von Kármán himself ever use the  horizontal line for his definition?
 24.   76.5    An airplane at the altitude of the Kármán line can't ignore the centrifugal force, can it?
 23.   76.1    An airplane at the altitude of the Kármán line can't ignore the centrifugal force, can he?
 22.   75.2    An airplane at the  altitude of the Kármán line  can't ignore the centrifugal force
 17.   73.4    Could the  definition of the Kármán line be described considering an airplane in orbit?
 16.   51.0    Why, at the altitude of the Kármán line, should a plane have to fly in a  straight line?
 15.   50.5    Could, at the altitude of the Kármán line a plane fly in a circular orbit?
 14.   47.7    Why, at the altitude of the Kármán line would a plane have to fly in a straight line?
 13.   45.9    Why at the altitude of the Kármán line  will a plane have to fly in a straight line?
 11.   39.3    Why should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curved one around the Earth?
 10.   24.9    Why should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curve band around the Earth?
  9.   24.6    Why should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curved line?
  7.   18.4    Why not interpret the Kármán line as a realistic, curved line?
  3.   14.4    Potential merits for a realistic definition of the Kármán line?
  2.    9.9  * Potential merits of different definition for a Kármán-like line?
  1.    0.0    Why not choose a more realistic definition of the Kármán line?

 * my suggested improved titled wording  

 edit  hours    title
 26.  106.0    Did von Kármán ever say that the centrifugal force could be ignored for his definition?
 25.  103.7    Did von Kármán himself ever use the  horizontal line for his definition?
 24.   94.3    An airplane at the altitude of the Kármán line can't ignore the centrifugal force, can it?
 23.   93.9    An airplane at the altitude of the Kármán line can't ignore the centrifugal force, can he?
 22.   93.0    An airplane at the  altitude of the Kármán line  can't ignore the centrifugal force
 17.   91.2    Could the  definition of the Kármán line be described considering an airplane in orbit?
 16.   68.8    Why, at the altitude of the Kármán line, should a plane have to fly in a  straight line?
 15.   68.3    Could, at the altitude of the Kármán line a plane fly in a circular orbit?
 14.   65.5    Why, at the altitude of the Kármán line would a plane have to fly in a straight line?
 13.   63.7    15:39:32 Why at the altitude of the Kármán line  will a plane have to fly in a straight line?
 11.   57.1    Why should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curved one around the Earth?
 10.   42.7    Why should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curve band around the Earth?
  9.   42.4    Why 18:23:41 should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curved line?
  7.   36.2    Why not interpret the Kármán line as a realistic, curved line?
  3.   32.2    Potential merits for a realistic definition of the Kármán line?
  2.   27.7  * Potential merits of different definition for a Kármán-like line?
  1.   17.8    Why not choose a more realistic definition of the Kármán line?

 edit  hours    title
 26.   88.9    Did von Kármán ever say that the centrifugal force could be ignored for his definition?
 25.   85.9    Did von Kármán himself ever use the  horizontal line for his definition?
 24.   76.5    An airplane at the altitude of the Kármán line can't ignore the centrifugal force, can it?
 23.   76.1    An airplane at the altitude of the Kármán line can't ignore the centrifugal force, can he?
 22.   75.2    An airplane at the  altitude of the Kármán line  can't ignore the centrifugal force
 17.   73.4    Could the  definition of the Kármán line be described considering an airplane in orbit?
 16.   51.0    Why, at the altitude of the Kármán line, should a plane have to fly in a  straight line?
 15.   50.5    Could, at the altitude of the Kármán line a plane fly in a circular orbit?
 14.   47.7    Why, at the altitude of the Kármán line would a plane have to fly in a straight line?
 13.   45.9    15:39:32 Why at the altitude of the Kármán line  will a plane have to fly in a straight line?
 11.   39.3    Why should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curved one around the Earth?
 10.   24.9    Why should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curve band around the Earth?
  9.   24.6    Why 18:23:41 should the Kármán line not be a realistic, curved line?
  7.   18.4    Why not interpret the Kármán line as a realistic, curved line?
  3.   14.4    Potential merits for a realistic definition of the Kármán line?
  2.    9.9  * Potential merits of different definition for a Kármán-like line?
  1.    0.0    Why not choose a more realistic definition of the Kármán line?

 * my suggested improved titled wording